In modal logic, the systems s4 and s5 are seen as necessary extensions to the system m as they iterate the principles of necessity and possibility and result in a stronger notions of those principles. Suppose that we have made a measurement for example, that some velocity vis 50. Every finitely axiomatizable modal logic with the finite model property is decidable. Categorical and kripke semantics for constructive s4 modal logic. Mar 12, 2014 the distinctive principle of s5 modal logic is a principle that was first annunciated by the medieval philosopher john duns scotus. The fuzzy variant s 5 c of the wellknown modal logic s5 is studied, c being a recursively axiomatized fuzzy propositional logic extending the basic fuzzy logic bl. A a, and the modal logic s5 kt4e is obtained from kt4 s4 by. Given an s4 logic m, the modal components of mconstitute a dense sublattice of nexts4 with the top element m\grz. It covers i basic approaches to logic, including proof theory and especially model theory, ii extensions of standard logic such as modal logic that are important in philosophy, and iii some elementary philosophy of logic.
A deep inference system for the modal logic s5 phiniki stouppa. Some systems also have historical names t, b, s4, s4. Natural deduction for full s5 modal logic with weak normalization. The language l plphas the following list of symbols as alphabet. Modal logic is, strictly speaking, the study of the deductive behavior of the. We say that a modal logic is consistent iff it is a proper subset of l.
Lewis concludes appendix ii by noting that the study of logic is best served by focusing on systems weaker than s5 and not exclusively on s5. In basic modal logic we have two new sentential operators. This paper surveys the main concepts and systems of modal logic. Pdf a resolution method for modal logic s5 researchgate. Chapter 1 topology and epistemic logic rohit parikh department of computer science, brooklyn college, and departments of computer sci. Completeness in modal logic sebastian enqvist 8210234111 course. In this section, we recall the axiomatic formulation and the kripke semantic of modal logic s5. If you want a proof in terms of kripke semantics, every s5 model is also an s4 model, because the accessibility relation for s5 is more constrained. Lewis is wellknown for trying to define a modally robust. It has been much argued that s4 is a true logic of knowledge. We say that a modal logic is consistent iff it is a proper subset of l, i.
Among the above systems, s4 has important significance since the intuitionistic propositional calculus can be interpreted in it, that is, with respect to every propositional non modal formula it is possible to construct a formula of modal logic such that. Example the modal logic s4 which is the normal modal logic kt4 in the standard. Easy speed math they dont teach you in school part 1 addition duration. Recall that modal logics tend to be much easier than. We give a uniform proof for the modal logics which are characterized by symmetric, transitive. Modern origins of modal logic stanford encyclopedia of. Covers propositional modal logic only, but has a very complete discussion of the various systems that come between k and s5. The procedure is based on the method of socratic proofs for modal logics, which is grounded in the logic of questions iel. Introduction s5 is the most popular modal logical system among modal metaphysicians. Two of these systems, s4 and s5 are still in use today. Aug 16, 2008 the aim of this paper is to present a loopfree decision procedure for modal propositional logics k4, s4 and s5. A modala word that expresses a modalityqualifies a statement.
The standard system of deduction in rstorder modal logic is normal modal logic, denoted k, which consists of all the inference rules and axiom schema of rstorder logic,3 plus the following rule and scheme. S4s5 6,7,8,1,2,16, normalizable natural deduction systems for intuitionistic modal logics 12,5 and for full classical s4 3, but not for full s5. One can also show that s5 is equivalent to system l. One should note that in some modal logics, like s4 ghilardi and zawadowski 1995, for some choices of. The distinctive principle of s5 modal logic is a principle that was first annunciated by the medieval philosopher john duns scotus.
Lewis is wellknown for trying to define a modally robust conditional that would. March 1, 2006 abstract we present a cutadmissible system for the modal logic s5 in a formalism that makes explicit and intensive use of deep inference. It shows how the tree or tableau method provides a simple and easily comprehensible decision procedure for systems such as k. A loopfree decision procedure for modal propositional logics. Modal logic s5 article about modal logic s5 by the free. The archetypical example of a modal logic, often taken to be the default example, is a system, called s4 modal logic or some slight variants s1, s2, of it, that aims to model the idea of propositions being possibly true or necessarily true.
It is a normal modal logic, and one of the oldest systems of modal logic of any kind. As we will see there is a complete version of the curryhoward isomorphism for it. Another introductory formal text that places fairly high demands on the reader. Modal logic is a type of formal logic primarily developed in the 1960s that extends classical propositional and predicate logic to include operators expressing modality. Systems between k and l 24 v7 furthermore, the historical systems s4, s5, b, t may be characterized in distinct ways. For example, the statement john is happy might be qualified by saying that john is usually happy, in which case the term usually is functioning as a modal. Given propositional logic, we can axiomatize t as follows. It covers i basic approaches to logic, including proof theory and especially model theory, ii extensions of standard logic such as modal logic that are important in philosophy, and. A cutfreegentzenstylesequentcalculusfor the modal logics5. Show that the canonical modal for the modal logic s4. Can anyone give a good simple explanation of s5 modal logic. Normalizable natural deduction rules for s4 modal operatorsa,world congress on universal logic,montreux,2005, 7980. This ongoing research aims at proving the conjecture. Deep inference is induced by the methods applied so.
It shows how the tree or tableau method provides a simple and easily comprehensible decision procedure for systems such as k, t, s4 and s5. The present paper attempts to extend the results of l, in the domain of the propositional calculus, to a class of modal systems called normal. The first two are straightforward and are left as an exercise tutorial sheet. Texts on modal logic typically do little more than mention its connections with the study of boolean algebras and topology. Prove that modal logic s4 is properly contained in s5. For example, one can prove that historical system s5 is equivalent to kt5, and that historical system b is equivalent to kdb. However, the term modal logic may be used more broadly for a family of. This is an advanced 2001 textbook on modal logic, a field which caught the attention of computer scientists in the late 1970s. Note that by definition, k is an axiom of any such logic. Modal logic is, strictly speaking, the study of the deductive behavior of the expressions it is necessary that and it is possible that. D originally comes from deontic, since this postulate was most prominent in deontic logic, the logic of. Natural deduction for full s5 modal logic with weak.
System s5 adds axiom c11, or alternatively c10 and c12, to the basis of s1. Categorical and kripke semantics for constructive s4 modal. Completeness in modal logic sebastian enqvist 8210234111. Semantical analysis of modal logic i normal modal propositional calculi by saul a. The propositional logic of metaphysical modality has been assumed to be at least as strong as the system t and to be no stronger than the system s5. The aim of this paper is to present a loopfree decision procedure for modal propositional logics k4, s4 and s5.
In this paper, our concern is the fragment of the modal language that com. Feel free to appeal to any theorems, corollaries, etc. This book is an introduction to logic for students of contemporary philosophy. The modal logic s4 kt4 is obtained from kt by adding the axiom schema. Modal logics the modal logics s4 and s5 semantic entailment. We list and discuss further examples of modal logic in more detail below in examples. The latter example shows that, in general, the set of axioms used to generate the normal modal logic is not. A modal is an expression like necessarily or possibly that is used to qualify the truth of a judgement.
Three kinds of kripke models are introduced and corresponding deductive systems are found. An extension of propositional calculus with operators that express various modes of truth. The strong modal operator is symbolized by the box, while the weak modal operator is symbolized by the diamond. Given an s4logic m, the modal components of mconstitute a dense sublattice of nexts4 with the top element m\grz. Pdf the aim of this work is to define a resolution method for the modal logic s5. Lewis, an early 20thcentury pioneer in modal logic.
The logic s4, for instance, is a classical modal logic with the axiomsk,t,4and rulesg, modus ponens and all propositional tautologies. Prominent modal logics are constructed from a weak logic called k after saul kripke. The meaning of set forth in this section is that of epistemic modal logic in a logic of knowledge. We first propose a conjunctive normal form s5cnf which is. It is formed with propositional calculus formulas and tautologies, and inference apparatus with substitution and modus ponens, but extending the. We prove that the procedure terminates and that it is sound and complete. Deep inference is induced by the methods applied so far in conceptually pure systems for this logic. The logic pm5 coincides with the modal system s5 and is characterized by the class of scales of depth 1, which are cluster of a. Tools and techniques in modal logic marcus kracht ii. Handout 3 extensions of k t, b, s4, s5 february 712. The language of modal logic s5 is obtained by adding to the language of propositional logic the two modal operators and. We show that in standard situations, when the base epistemic systems are t, s4, and s5, the resulting justified common knowledge systems are normal modal logics, which places them within the scope. Modality, s4, origin essentialism, fivedimensionalism, impossible world.
The logic s4, or kt4, is characterized by axioms t and. This book presupposes that readers know the attractions and power of this approach, including the notions of logical syntax, semantics, proof, and metatheory of formal systems. This work revealed that s4 and s5 are models of interior algebra, a proper extension of boolean algebra originally designed to capture the properties of the interior and closure operators of topology. The procedure is based on the method of socratic proofs for modal logics, which is. Fitch, naive modal logic, unpublished lecture notes. In logic and philosophy, s5 is one of five systems of modal logic proposed by clarence irving lewis and cooper harold langford in their 1932 book symbolic logic. A loopfree decision procedure for modal propositional.
1434 63 184 1035 1563 1431 762 1445 82 1362 496 406 1616 203 177 748 857 331 1597 201 386 171 251 145 1296 1010 1488 43 845 1263 708 1168 808 802